本研究旨於蒐集國內、外文獻中航空公司施行之綠色運輸策略與方案， 並透過專家意見評比，分析出較為適用並能於不同營運型態航空公司 優先採行之方案。經歸納後，綠色運輸策略構面包括修訂航線規劃思維、改 善設備或動力之使用、改變飛航作業流程、運務作業及客艙減重措施、文件 業務無紙化、改善地勤飛機服務作業等六項，所屬方案準則共29 項。透過 排序成對比較法計算訪談專家之相對權重，獲得改善設備或動力之使用為最 適用之策略構面，並對各構面中之方案準則進行相對評比。再者，利用可 行－有效分析法針對兩種不同航空公司營運型態進行全體方案之評比。結果 發現大多數方案對組合型航空公司較具有效性，但對低成本航空公司則較具 可行性。

This study firstly reviews green transport strategies and alternatives employed by airlines from previous literatures, and then comparing higher adaptable and applicable alternatives for airlines and summarizing different green business models by investigating industrial experts. The green transport strategies include revising the concepts of route planning, improving the use of equipment and power, altering the procedure of flight operation, de-weighting schemes in traffic operation and in cabin, paperless documents, and improving aircraft service on ground. In total, there are 29 sub-strategies affiliated with these 6 strategies. This study used a rank pair-wised comparison (RPC) process to measure the relative weights of compared green strategies and sub-strategies for their rankings. The results show that improvement of equipment and aircraft power plants is the most feasible green strategy. Furthermore, this study used a feasibility-effectiveness analysis (FEA) technique to compare the effectiveness of all sub-strategies for combination carriers and low cost carriers (LCCs). Most of sub-strategies are found to be more effective for combination carriers, but majority of sub-strategies are found to be more feasible for LCCs.