篇名 | 國軍懲罰評議制度的縱橫觀察 |
---|---|
卷期 | 63:2 |
並列篇名 | A Survey of the Punishment review system of the Military |
作者 | 林文村 、 蕭惠予 |
頁次 | 044-083 |
關鍵字 | 評議會 、 陳述及申辯 、 閱覽卷宗權 、 客觀性義務 、 合義務性裁量 、 復議 、 Appraisal Meeting 、 Statements and Defense 、 Read the File Rights 、 Objective Obligation 、 Compulsory Discretion 、 Reconsideration |
出刊日期 | 201704 |
現行國軍懲罰評議制度,乃強化舊法之規定,提高召開層級、委員性別比例之要求及法律專業人員之參與,藉以避免權責長官行政權的專擅。但由於條文的規定過少,顯不足完整規範評議制度的內容,恐造成實務執行面的困擾。本文透過整體的觀察,從評議會之召開、委員組成、程序的進行、決議的核定,本於行為人程序利益保障的觀點,提出法制上的建議及實務執行層面的意見,期能更強化事前程序之功能,落實國軍人權保障之旨趣。
The current Punishment review system of the Military, reinforcing the provisions of the old law , is to avoid the monopoly of executive power by raising the level of holding members and asking for the requirements of the sex ratio of members and the participation of legal professionals. However, the provisions are inadequate to regulate the whole contents of the Punishment review system completely, and it may lead to the trouble of the implementation of practical. Through the overall observation, this paper puts forward suggestions on the legal system and views on the practical implementation level from the perspectives of the convening of the council, the composition of the members, the proceeding of the procedure and the approval of the resolution due to the view of the protection of the procedural interests of perpetrators not only strengthening the function of the befordhand process but also fulfilling the purport of human rights protection.