朱熹《四書章句集注》影響深遠，自宋以來，為儒學的核心經典，重要性應無可疑，只是朱熹援據既未明注所出，風氣所及，關乎學術態度的不同，甚至產生漠、宋學之爭。觀點的分歧，也影響後人詮釋朱熹《四書章句集注》的角度，遂有「學古」、「革新」兩種不同立場的論斷，本文在前人研究的基礎上，嘗試輯出朱熹《四書章句集注》徵引書目，經部共六十九條，史部十六條，于部三十七條，集部八條，共一百二十條，其中宋人著作有六十一條，佔一半左右，以朱熹取閱之方便，實是情理之常，朱熹取徑之廣，並無明顯之偏頗，希望藉由本文輯考之主作，能平息這種分歧的觀點，也希望對於朱熹撰作《四書章句集注》這一段融鑄眾說的過程，有更清楚的了解。

"The Four books selected sentences" edited by Chu His (1130-1200AD), influencing permanent. From Song dynasty, it is always the core of the Confucianists classic and the importance should be doubtlessly. However, he did not clearly point out where the reference came from, because this fashion is very different from standard researcher's attitude, even causing the debate between Han and Song. This difference also affects the point of view to interpret "The Four books selected sentences" for the later researchers, so there appear "cherish the past" and "innovation" two different contestation. This paper base on the earlier research, trying to find out the "references" for "The Four books selected sentences", where the part of classics contents 69 categories, the part of history contents 16 categories; philosophy is 27 and literature is 8, total are 120 categories. Among these, 61 categories were written by the time of Song, almost the half number of total, for the sake of convenient, it is reasonable. Chu His wildly use the classics and no obvious tendency. We attempt to exam and summary the "references" for "The Four books selected sentences" by the this paper, and to appease the dissension mention earlier. On the other hand, we also want to understand more clear of the "mixing" process in "The Four books selected sentences".