賀貽孫的《騷筏》主要評論屈原及宋玉的作品，與他的另一詩學著作《詩筏》相互發明，實為研究賀氏文學理念與晚明文學批評的重要資料。惜國內對《騷筏》的詳細論評始終闕如，僅內地有零星論文略略提及，亟待學者研究補充。故本文擬細讀《騷筏》，歸納其批評觀點，闡發其文學理念，並以己意略作評論。論述的重點將包括：一、《騷筏》的批評體例；二、《騷筏》所呈顯的批評觀念，區分：「作品與作品」、「作品與作者」及「作品與讀者」等層面略加探討。間並引《詩筏》及賀氏其他著作之論述互證，略申其與晚明竟陵派的文學淵源，期對賀貽孫的文學理念及其時代意義能有更完整的理解。

Sao-fa( 騷筏) of Heh Yie Suen( 賀貽孫1605-1688, an important poem critic in the transition between Ming and Qing) mainly criticized the works of Ch’ü Yüan(屈原) and Song Yuh(宋玉). It was done at the same time as his other work Shi-fa( 詩筏). Sao-fa and Shi-fa are truly the important materials for studying Heh’s literary ideology and the late-Ming Dynasty’s literary criticism. However, it is incomprehensible that in Taiwan we do not see any detailed critique about Sao-fa. It has merely been referred to in a few papers. This book really awaits scholars to study and ameliorate. Therefore, this paper will closely study Sao-fa and conclude its points of criticism in order to manifest its literary ideology. At the same time, by including my personal points of view, I will comment a bit about Sao-fa and its author. In the description the focuses are 1) Sao-fa’s style of criticism; 2) the literary critical points shown in Sao-fa, which are divided into three levels: work and work, work and the author, the author and the readers. The three above-mentioned levels are discussed briefly. Throughout the paper Shi-fa and Heh’s other works are also used to reflect on Sao-fa as a way to refer to Heh’s literary history with Late-ming Dynasty’s Jing-ling School(竟陵派). Hopefully this paper will give the readers a more complete understanding to Heh’s literary ideology and his importance in the history, and I am sure that Sao-fa is critical to an understanding of the development of literary criticism and theory of Ming Dynasty.