文章詳目資料

NTU Studies in Language and Literature 

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 “We Did Not Know”: Reading German Silence, Guilt, and Responsibility in Uwe Timm’s In My Brother’s Shadow: A Life and Death in the SS
卷期 37
並列篇名 「我們對此一無所知」:試論烏韋•提姆《我的納粹哥哥》中德國人的沈默、罪惡、與責任
作者 蔡美玉
頁次 023-046
關鍵字 German SilenceGuiltthe HolocaustPerpetratorsEthical RemembranceUwe Timm德國人的沈默罪惡大屠殺加害者倫理回憶烏韋‧提姆THCI
出刊日期 201706
DOI 10.6153/NTUSLL.2017.37.02

中文摘要

自二次世界大戰以來,大屠殺及納粹所犯下的滔天大罪成為德國人的羞恥與 罪惡,羞恥與罪惡就如夢靨,纏繞戰後德國。這其中最難以面對的就是德國人對 猶太人苦難所表現出來的「沈默」。德國作家烏韋‧提姆(Uwe Timm)在其自傳 式著作《我的納粹哥哥》中,試圖剖析德國對納粹的記憶所帶來的眾多複雜難解 的議題。書中提姆的哥哥卡爾‧海因茨於十八歲時自願成為納粹武裝親衛隊的一 員,並在抗俄前線作戰時負傷身亡。哥哥戰時的日記在他去世後被送回提姆家, 提姆從日記中得知哥哥參與攻擊歐裔猶太人和俄國士兵的行動,但哥哥對戰爭平 淡及不帶感情的敘述卻與提姆記憶中勇敢溫柔的形象大相逕庭。於是以哥哥為 例,提姆深究長存於二戰後德國家庭的重要疑問。為描述德國的罪惡和責任,提 姆在兩種不同模式的衝突再現裡切換:一為對哥哥逝世的痛苦,延伸成為提姆一 家和普遍德國人的痛;二為記述納粹罪行受害者─猶太人─的痛。本文以批 評家蘇珊娜・盧曼(Susanne Luhmann)所提出之「倫理回憶」(ethical remembrance) 及恩內斯婷・施蘭特(Ernestine Schlant)所關注之「德國人的沈默」 (German Silence)此二論點,分析提姆在《我的納粹哥哥》一書中如何建構戰 後德國第二代及其後代新的回憶史觀。這樣的史觀不是與父母輩的作為全然劃清 界線,而是願意擔負父母輩及德國的歷史責任,打破德國人對猶太人苦難的 「沈默」。

英文摘要

Since the advent of World War Two, the haunting presence of the Holocaust as well as the legacy of shame and guilt for the crimes of the Nazi era have troubled generations of post-war Germans. In Germany’s dealing with the Nazi past, the vexing difficulty of representing Jewish suffering has become the most challenging legacy of the Holocaust. Uwe Timm’s autobiographical work In My Brother’s Shadow attempts to respond to this challenge by recounting and problematizing German silence toward Holocaust victims. Timm’s work tells the story of his older brother, Karl-Heinz, who had volunteered for the Waffen SS at 18 and died from battle wounds while fighting on the Russian front. Reading his brother’s war diary which was sent to the Timm’s family after Karl’s death, Timm is faced with conflicting feelings about his brother, who was remembered and idolized in the family as a brave and gentle spirit. Making use of his brother’s example, Timm pursues questions that have been of central importance to many German families since the Second World War. In an attempt to address the legacy of German guilt and responsibility, Timm alternates between two modes of conflicting representation: on the one hand, he empathizes with the sufferings of his brother—by extension, the sufferings of his family and ordinary Germans—and on the other, he also accounts properly for the suffering of Nazi victims. This essay will use categories of Susanne Luhmann’s “ethical remembrance” along with Ernestine Schlant’s conception of “German silence” about the Holocaust to argue that In My Brother’s Shadow offers a new remembrance approach for second and subsequent generation Germans to acknowledge the genuine suffering of Jewish victims and to keep their memories of it in Germany’s critical reflection on the Nazi past. Timm’s pedagogical model of confronting the familial legacies of perpetration involves a willingness to acknowledge the guilt of the parent generation as well as to bear personal relationship to German responsibility for the Holocaust.

相關文獻