篇名 | 不同學習風格物理治療學生對問題導向學習課程之感受 |
---|---|
卷期 | 42:2 |
並列篇名 | Perceptions of Physical Therapist Students with Different Learning Styles about Problem-Based Learning |
作者 | 郭怡良 、 林玉雯 、 陳沛嵐 |
頁次 | 073-079 |
關鍵字 | 物理治療教育 、 問題導向學習 、 學習風格 、 Physical therapy education 、 Problem-based learning 、 Learning style 、 TSCI |
出刊日期 | 201706 |
DOI | 10.6215/FJPT.PTS20170642023 |
背景與目的:本研究旨在探究不同學習風格學生對問題導向學習(Problem-Based Learning,以下簡稱PBL) 的戚受•進而對其應用於國内大學物理治療教育提出建言。方法:36位在三年級上、下學期經歷傳統講述教 學和PBL課程的物理治療學生,接受Kolb學習風格量表施测。接著由同化、聚斂、調適與擴散學習風格學 生中各選取三位造行半結構晤談。結果:不同學習風格學生均認為傳統講述教學造成學生惯於被動聽講和背 誦記憶,而PBL引導學生資料搜尋、溝通討論、包容他人看法、知悉多元答案。聚歛型學習風格學生均喜 歡PBL,其他類型學習風格學生烕受較不一致,並出現不喜歡PBL的情形。學期結束時,最終喜歡與不喜歡 PBL的學生人數比例為3 : 1。喜歡原因與小组討論、資料分享有關,不喜歡原因與不確定烕、學習疲乏、資 料蒐尋過於費時有關。結論:不同學習風格的物理治療學系學生對PBL課程的戚受不一。欲在國内物理治療 教育中推行PBL,建議考慮降低不確定戚、學習疲乏、資料蒐尋過於費時的負面因素,如此方能提高學生對於 PBL的接受程度。
Background and objective: This study investigated the pcrccprions of students with differenr learning styles about problem-based learning (PBL) to provide suggesrions for physical therapy education programs at universities in Taiwan. Methods: The Kolb Learning Style Inventory was adopted to assess 36 students majoring physical therapy in their third year of university. The students received conventional lecture-based courses in the first semester and a PBL-bascd course in the second semester. Subsequently, scmistructured interviews were adminivStcrcd to students with assimilating, converging, accommodating, and diverging learning styles. For each category, three students were interviewed. Results: Ihc students considered that the conventional lecture-based teaching emphasized listening and memorizing, whereas PBL motivated them to search for information, communicate and discuss, consider other peopled opinions, and generate multiple answers. All the students with a converging learning style preferred PBL; however, not all students with other learning styles preferred PBL. At the end of the second semester, the ratio of students who liked and disliked PBL was 3:1. Students preferred PBL because it involved group discussions and information sharing; by contrast, they disliked it because of uncertainty, learning fatigue, and the overly time-consuming process of information searching. Conclusion: Physical therapist students with different learning styles varied their perceptions toward PBL courses. Therefore, negative factors, such as uncertainly, learning fatigue, and the overly time-consuming process of information searching, should be minimized to enhance students, acceptance of PBL, thereby promoting PBL in the pliysical therapy education in Taiwan.