哲學諮商是一種具體的哲學實踐，既然是哲學實踐自然有其多面向發展的可能與需要，而目前所發展出來傾向以理性為基調的模式，為了豐富哲學諮商的內容，也吸引哲學實踐的不同對象，關懷倫理學異於理性為主的模式，是本文的研究動機。本文首先分析當代哲學諮商的意義、目的、方法及其面對的挑戰，其次陳述關懷倫理學的理論特色及其對現代生活、理性的自我與幸福的批判，再者提出關懷倫理取向的哲學諮商觀點與其實踐的方法，並討論其可能被質疑的問題與其回應之道。最後本文認為關懷取向的哲學諮商應該是：一、重視諮商師與個案即是關懷者與被關懷者的身分，他們彼此都在文化脈絡中形成「關係自我」；二、諮商師與個案不需避開是公正無私的關係，代之的是關懷情感的關懷關係；三、諮商師實踐關懷，而個案受到關懷，彼此回應與肯認，相互都能得到幸福的滿足。

Philosophical counseling is a specific philosophical practice, as is the practice of philosophy has its multi-oriented development. The development of tendencies in contemporary philosophical counseling is reason-based model. In order to enrich the content of philosophical counseling, but also to attract different objects of philosophical practice, to approach care ethics which different from the rational model is the motivation for my article. In this paper, the first is to analyze contemporary philosophical counseling, including its meaning, purpose, method and challenge. Secondly I point out some features of care ethics, also discuss its implications for modern lives, especially criticism these ideas “rational self”, “happiness” in cultural context. Furthermore, to argue the caring-oriented philosophical counseling and its method to practice, to discuss some challenges about care ethics. Finally I suppose that philosophical counseling would be: a) counselor who is career, and client who is to be cared, they each other are formed “relationship self” in culture context; b) Counselor would not avoid be impartial of relationship with client, instead of care feelings and empathy; and c) Counselor practice one’s caring, at the same time client accept counselor’s caring, to response and to confirm each other, mutual wound get respective happiness.