本文探討了明代中葉的大家王世貞與主導朝鮮後期文壇潮流的金昌協對《史記》的認識及繼承《史記》的文學實踐。金昌協根據自己的觀點理解《史記》重新樹立了把它作為文章典範的地位，而且為了習得典範文章的精髓而試圖從散文作法和文章評點來分析《史記》作品。在《信陵君傳》等《史記》各篇作品的分析上可以確認金昌協敷衍茅坤等唐宋派文人們的視角的同時，更加縝密地運用批評的言語且更加細緻地分析來擴大深化批評的領域。王世貞也留下了諸多關於《史記》各作品和人物的書評，而且還作了十分肯定《史記評林》具有的意義的序文，從散文批評的觀點理解《史記》的潮流，前後呼應。只不過他超越了只將《史記》理解為散文的古典的文章家或駐足於解釋字句的訓詁家狹隘的《史記》繼承與理解，為了繼承這整理和記錄一個時代歷史及現實中人們鮮活生活的史書《史記》，而試圖自己整理明代的制度和文化，以及各階層人民的生活。整理過程中得以創作《弇山堂別集》、《嘉靖以來首輔傳》和多數的商人商婦墓誌銘，這本身成為證言當代最重要的記錄，後來其中的不少部分被編入《明史》。

This paper studies Wang Shizhen 王世貞’s the aspect of the Recognition and Succession of Shij 史記, in the relationship between The Joseon and China Literary Circles。Wang is worthy of note in that The Joseon mainstream literary man in 16th century modeled after Shijizuan 史記纂 written a preface by him while they had published Shiji Anthology of a printed by Joseon, titled the Sachan 史簒. But Wang also received some harsh criticism for copying from Shiji by Kim Changhyup 金昌協, one of the leading writers in 17th century Joseon. So This paper examined the publication process of the Sachan in Joseon first, and revised Wang’s own distinctive aspects of succession of Shiji by comparison with Kim. The publication of the Sachan in Joseon and Kim’s the literary commentaries of Shiji were all influenced by a prose writer critique of Shiji, a new trend in 16th century Ming dynasty. Wang had also responded to such tendencies, but he should succeed to Shiji of a complete contemporary historical records and even go a little further. And then he had compiled and wrote Yanshantangbieji 弇山堂別集, Jiajingyilaishoufuzhuan 嘉靖以來首輔 傳 and a biography of merchants, aimed at recording people of all ranks and classes, system and culture of the contemporary Ming dynasty. Through these routes, he could present his own way, succeeding to Shiji of the history recording contemporary people and putting together an era.