親密關係暴力危險評估是近年來學術界與實務界非常關注的議題，在我國亦開始逐步推動相關的危險評估方案，但針對親密關係暴力危險評估在方法上應如何操作，至今仍無較具體與一致的模式。本文檢視文獻將親密暴力危險評估的方法歸類爲四類：非結構性的臨床評估、量表評估、被害人自我評估及跨機構危險評估等，透過質性研究法，深入訪談九位參與實施危險評估方案的實務工作者，了解實務工作人員如何進行危險評估，以及不同評估方法對危險評估的助益與限制。最後本文根據研究發現，進而就實務操作未來之發展，提出整合性危險評估模式，流程區分爲第一階段初步評估、第二階段專業詐估及第三階段之整合性評估與風險管理，並提出實務操作之相關建義。

There are more concerns for academic and practical professionals on intimate partner violence risk assessment recently. In Taiwan, a couple of risk assessment programs regarded to intimate partner violence have been initiated. However, how should intimate partner violence risk assessment be conducted? It's still under discussion. This paper reviewed literature and categoried four intimate partner violence risk assessment methods: unstructured clinical assessment, actuarial assessment, victim's assessment, and multiple-agency risk assessment conference. Via interviewing 9 social workers and police officers, this research aims to understand how front line service providers conducting risk assessment. What are their experiences on the four kinds risk assessment methods? And what are the benefits and limits on conducting the four risk assessment methods? The research results indicated that the data sources, costs, specialities, limits and validity of each risk assessment methods. Finally, this paper suggested a coordinated risk assessment model which including three stages and combining the four methods. Also, some suggestions for future development are presented.