本文擬由族群團體之角度切入，透過若干指標之例舉，佐證台灣原住民族之社會排除現象；分析重心主要聚焦於原住民對族群不利地位（社會排除狀態）的主觀認知與是否形成結構歸因（社會排除詮釋）之關聯因素探討，並討論其對相應族群優惠政策之期待。綜合受訪原住民對於族群不利地位的「內在歸因」與「外在歸因」之整體回答傾向，將其區分爲個人歸因、結構歸因、雙重歸因與無法判斷菁四種歸因型態。分析發現個人歸因之傾向乃隨教育程度、所得高低成正向關係，與同族之族群接觸比例成反比，而結構歸因之樣本特性恰恰相反。加入「個人努力之公平性評價」之考量後，顯示在「社會不公」歸因表達同意的原住民，也會因爲個人公平經驗而同意大部分原住民也要爲其不利地位負責，因而增強了雙重歸因之表達傾向。此外，資料分析也發現結構歸因與族群優惠政策態度之正向關聯，至於族群接觸之分析結果則呈現同族接觸／族群集中等效應確實會強化我群意識，進而增加其對族群優惠之支持立場；而跨族接觸經驗多寡則與族群優惠政策態度呈現反向關係。

The purpose of research is to survey disadvantage by indexes within ethnic groups. We emphasize subjective perception and interpretation of the indigenous people about their disadvantageous status. Finally, discount the possibility of related ethnic positive discrimination policy. Instead of ”internal attribution” and ”external attribution”, the research comprehends four attribution patterns: individual attribution, structural attribution, dual attribution and undetermined attribution to discount disadvantaged status of the Indigenous people. The research finds that individual attribution with education level and with income level is positive relation; even so, with inner-ethnic contact is negative. Though, structural attribution is just the reverse. The research finds that there is positive relation between structural attribution and ethnic positive discrimination policy. Inner-ethnic contact/tribe gathering will enhance group consciousness and advocate positive discrimination policy. Nevertheless, inter-ethnic contact and attitude on ethnic positive discrimination policy shows negative relation.