鄰避情結（Not in My Backyard，縮寫NIMBY）是一個複雜，充滿矛盾的現象。依據內政部訂定之「推展社會福利補助經費申請項目及基準」，身心障礙福利機構基地三百公尺內不得有「鄰避設施」。但是，當身心障礙設施在迴避這些鄰避設施的同時，自己也經常成爲社區居民所抗拒的鄰避設施。本研究以身心障礙機構或設施抗爭過程中，第一線處理工作者爲研究對象。透過訪談瞭解他們在抗爭事件中與民眾互動的經驗，當時所採取的因應措施，以及背後的思考邏輯。透過與現有鄰避文獻的對話與討論，比較身心障礙機構與污染性鄰避設施之異同，來給目前相關研究提出新的觀點與方向。

NIMBY (Not-in-my-back-yard) is a complicated and controversial phenomenon. According to the Ministry of the Interior, services for the disabled should not be established within 300 meters of NIMBY facilities. However, services for the disabled are themselves considered NTMBY facilities by local communities, and thus often face demonstrations. In this study, we interview first-line agency workers who have managed and handled community protests against the service agencies for the disabled in Taiwan. This study compares their experiences and strategies in handling these public protests with how, as reported in several studies, protests against pollution facilities have been handled. By doing this, this study shows new perspectives and directions for future study.