行政院公共工程委員會為避免工程採購履約爭議之案 件，因法院訴訟冗長，致影響公共預算投入經濟活動，從2012 年起開始推動新仲裁機制。本文除介紹仲裁機制之內容，包 括仲裁人之選定、主任仲裁人之共推、公開仲裁程序及仲裁 判斷書、仲裁判斷書應記載事實及理由及仲裁庭得不適用衡 平原則為判斷，將一併探討其法源及美日對於工程履約爭議 仲裁立法例，以期對工程履約爭議之加速解決，建議妥適之 仲裁解決機制，並符合國際化之要求。

To avoid the compliance dispute cases of engineering procurement, due to lengthy court proceedings, induced public budget to economic activity, Public Construction Commission has promoted new arbitration mechanism since 2012. This paper will introduce the new arbitration mechanism, including arbitrator election, chief arbitrator jointly recommend, equity arbitration, open arbitration proceedings and awards, arbitration awards should contain facts and reasons, arbitration court can’t apply equity arbitration. Besides, it will explore the legal sources, US and Japan construction arbitration legislation. This paper will recommend some proper arbitration mechanism to accelerate the solution of compliance dispute and meet the international requirements. I would emphasis that the arbitration mechanism only Director-General, Legal Affairs Bureau of the Kaohsiung City Government; Professor, Department of Economic and Financial Law. Ph.D, Collgeg of Law, National Chengchi University.