文章詳目資料

醒吾學報

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 整合VIKOR 與AHP 建立自行車路線決策模式ー以豐原區為例
卷期 56
並列篇名 A Decision Model for Bike Routes Selection Using AHP Integrated VIKOR : A Case Study In Fengyuan
作者 張靖鄧淑貞李泰琳
頁次 061-080
關鍵字 VIKOR自行車路線層級分析法AHPCycling RoutesVIKOR
出刊日期 201707

中文摘要

本研究以整合AHP 與VIKOR 建立自行車路線評選決策模式:以台中市豐原地區為 例,透過文獻整理與專家訪談,建立4 大構面與16 項評估準則之層級架構,並設計專 家問卷,透過AHP 資料分析取得各準則之權重關係,再應用VIKOR 來排列各方案之 優先順序。AHP 分析結果顯示,在構面權重中「道路設施」取得63.42%,由此可見道 路設施對於自行車騎乘者對於遴選騎乘路線時佔很大的考量因素;在準則權重中前五名 分別為「道路鋪面」佔36.21%,「公路車」佔9.82%,「道路坡度」佔8.11%,「遮蔭設 施」佔7.58%,「性別」佔7.51%,由此可知騎乘者在評估準則中還是比較偏重道路設施 的相關準則,其次是車輛設備。經過VIKOR 分析後,丁路線排序第一,甲路線與戊路 線排序同為第二,乙路線排序第四,丙路線排序第五,可供自行車熱愛者或團體評選自 己喜愛的路線。

英文摘要

In this study, the application of the integration of AHP and VIKOR to build bike routes selection Decision Model in Fengyuan, Taichung City. Through literature review and expert interview, a hierarchical structure of the four dimensions of the 16 evaluation criteria was built. AHP was used to compute the weights of all criteria. VIKOR was used to rank all bike routes. The results showed that road is the most significant dimension for bike riders since whose weight accounts for 63.42%. The criteria weights in the top five are road surfacing accounts for 36.21%, road bikes accounts for 9.82%, road gradient accounts for 8.11%, shade Facility accounts 7.58%, and gender accounts for 7.51%. It can be seen in the assessment guidelines that bike riders firstly emphasize on road infrastructure related criteria, and secondly on bike equipment. All routes are ranked by the VIKOR, route D is the first, route A and route E are the second, followed by route B, and route C. This result is helpful for bike enthusiasts or groups to select their favorite routes.

相關文獻