蘇軾名列唐宋古文八大家，亦為歷代散文大家，其散文內容更橫跨經、史、子、集。後人對蘇軾散文評述甚多，惟對經學中的《春秋》學評論較少。蘇軾雖無《春秋》學專書，然其收錄在《蘇軾文集》中的散文題名與《春秋》學相關者亦有二十六篇，筆者以為其中當有可觀之處。蘇軾於嘉祐二年（A.D.1057）中進士，當時以〈春秋對義〉居第一，足見其對《春秋》三傳有獨到之觀點。本文試以蘇軾這十篇〈春秋對義〉為例，並將其分入「君臣之道」、「國家政治」、「道德修養」等三方面，以論其對《春秋》三傳之批評取捨，進而瞭解蘇軾早年對《春秋》學的觀點。

Su shi was ranked in the Eight Great Literary Men during the Tang and Song Dynasties, also known as the famous essayist during the past times, whose prose was including confucian classics, historical records, philosophical writings and miscellaneous works. There were many comments on Su Shi's prose, but few on the "Spring and Autumn Annals" in confucian classics. Although Su Shi did not have monographs on the Spring and Autumn Annals, he wrote 26 articles collected in Su Shi's Essays related to the Spring and Autumn Annals, which the author believed to be quite a few. Su Shi was jinshi of the second year of Jiayou （A.D. 1057） with three biography of Spring and Autumn Period ranking first at that time. which could proved that he had a unique view on it. In this article, the author tries to take Su Shi's ten articles of three biography of Spring and Autumn Period as an example, and divide it into three aspects such as "the ways to be Monarch and His Subjects ", "national politics", "moral cultivation", and discuss his criticism and choice of three biography of Spring and Autumn Period in order to further understand Su Shi's early view of the Spring and Autumn Annals.