文章詳目資料

放射治療與腫瘤學

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 三種不同放射治療技術之全腦及脊髓照射誘發二次癌症危險度分析
卷期 25:2
並列篇名 Retrospective evaluationof secondary cancer risksby three radiation therapy techniques incranio-spinal irr adiation
作者 黃雅玉李曉飛陳怡任廖宗義黃郁傑張寶樹
頁次 097-109
關鍵字 全腦脊髓照射器官等效劑量額外絕對危險度Cranio-spinal irradiationOrgan equivalent doseExcess absolute riskSecondary cancer riskTSCI
出刊日期 201806
DOI 10.6316/TRO.201806_25(2)0004

中文摘要

研究目的: 比較三維順形放射治療技術(three dimension conformal radiation therapy, 3D-CRT)、強度調控放射治療(intensity modulation radiation therapy, IMRT)及體積調控弧形 放射治療(volumetric-modulated arc therapy, VMAT)三種治療技術利用器官等效劑量(organ equivalent dose, OED)分析建立二次癌症的風險評估模型,以得到額外絕對危險度(Excess absolute risk, EAR)。 材料與方法:選取2010 年3 月至2016 年2 月間接受全腦脊髓照射(craniospinal irradiation, CSI)治療的五位病患做為研究對象。規劃3D-CRT、IMRT 及VMAT 三種不同之治療計畫,將 治療計畫所得之劑量體積直方圖(dose-volume histogram, DVH)資料輸出,執行器官等效劑量 (OED)之參數計算,建立額外絕對危險度(EAR)之三種模型,用以評估因放射治療所誘發之 二次癌症機率。 結果:VMAT 較3D-CRT 及IMRT 顯著的減少特定危急器官之平均劑量。在額外絕對危險度 (EAR)評估結果中顯示,在全腦脊髓照射中引起小腸(small intestine)二次癌症之額外絕對危 險度為每萬人中大於50 人,其中以3D-CRT 之治療技術評估結果為最高;肺部(Lungs)二次癌 症之額外絕對危險度為每萬人中大於30 人,以VMAT 之治療技術評估結果為最高。在肝臟及口 腔二次癌症之額外絕對危險度為每萬人中小於10 人以內,機率極低。 結論:本研究為首篇針對全腦脊髓照射(CSI)三種不同之技術進行劑量學之差異比較,並建立台 灣本地接受CSI 放射治療患者二次癌症危險度參數,提供臨床治療規劃之二次癌症危險度參考指 標。

英文摘要

Purpose : To compare the secondary cancer risk (SCR) in cranio-spinal irradiation for three radiotherapy- planning techniques, namely, three dimension conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensitymodulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The SCRmodel was established by usingthe organ equivalent dose (OED) to calculate the value of extra absolute risk (EAR). Materials & Methods : In total five patients were included who underwent cranio-spinal irradiation between March 2010 and February 2016 in our hospital. Three different treatment plans were created including 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) obtained was used to calculate OED and SCR. Three SCR models established can be utilized to evaluate secondary cancer risks after cranio-spinal irradiation. Results : The highest EAR value in small intestine was greater than 50 for 3D-CRT; as well as in lung was greater than 30 (per 10,000/per year) for VMAT. However, the EAR values in liver and oral cavity were less than 10 (per 10,000/per year) for the three techniques. Conclusion : This is the first study to establish the EAR parameters and evaluation of SCRs by three radiotherapy-planning techniques in cranio-spinal irradiation in Taiwan.The result can be used as a clinical reference for evaluating secondary malignancy risks after radiation therapy.

本卷期文章目次

相關文獻