即便巴迪烏以其六○、七○年代毛派馬列主義立場對於安那其主義 多所批判，但本文主張透過關照他整體的政治本體論，開展他的思想和 安那其思想與實踐之間的對話與交集。本文主要目的在於探究巴迪烏與 安那其主義之間（錯失）的「遭遇」，這意味著彼此之間複多且不確定的關 聯。本文將首先描繪當代安那其的理論情境，接著扼要地闡述巴迪烏的 政治本體論，聚焦於事件與主體產生的條件。接下來討論巴迪烏如何回 應、重訪包括巴黎公社和近年的「阿拉伯之春」，從這些起義、暴動和革 命事件辨識新的政治主體、政治組織、甚至想像未來的可能性，不存在 的如得以存在。最後我將以阿圖塞的機緣唯物論為轉接，探討巴迪烏與 當代安那其行動組織「隱形委員會」（the Invisible Committee）是否有任何 安那其同盟的可能。

Even though Badiou in the 1960s and 1970s voiced a fervent critique of anarchism from a Maoist, Marx-Leninist position, this essay argues for a more holistic view on his political ontology to tackle his potential dialogues with contemporary anarchist thought and praxis. This essays aims at Badiou’s “(mis-)encounter” with anarchism, which implies multiple and uncertain intersections between them. The first part offers a comprehensive description of the situation of contemporary anarchism. The focus of the discussion then shifts to Badiou’s political ontology centered on the emergence of the event and the subject. How Badiou responds to and revisits such insurrections as the Paris Commune and the Arab Spring will be explored regarding new political subjectivities, organizations, the imagination of futures and the existence of the inexistent. Althusser’s aleatory materialism works as a pivot for carrying the micro-materialist thought experiment of this essay to the Invisible Committee and testing its alignment with Badiou.