本回應文焦點聚集在兩個面向：對研究方法的反思與對性別研究建制 化的反思。在研究方法上，本文探討研究的物質脈絡，以及此脈絡如何影 響知識的生產。和所有女性主義研究一樣，本文強調此研究結果的『部分 性』（partiality)，並希望此『部分性』研究結果能帶來更多的研究對 話。同時，本論文討論此論文的生產脈絡即是性別研究建制化，而這建制 化就如_刀兩仞，有得有失，唯有藉由學術社群的共同反思與對話才能減 少建制化所帶來的學術僵化現象。

This response essay reflects on the methodologies used to conduct this research. Following the spirit of the feminist scholarship, the essay discusses the material conditions under which this research is conducted and reflects on how the material conditions shape the research methodology. It argues that, like any research, this research article offers only partial findings, and it looks forward to more dialogues to enrich this scholarship. The essay ends with a discussion on the dilemmas of institutionalization一the context in which this research is conducted and how it affects the production of knowledge.