特種勤務係指以維護總統、副總統等安全維護對象之安全為目的，對安全 維護對象之危害及滋擾加以排除，所採取之安全維護作為，惟於特種勤務執行 時，亦應兼顧人民權益之保障。特種勤務條例第12 條係以電檢門查驗人民之 法律依據，惟依其規定除應受安全維護區及比例原則之限制外，尚應準用警察 職權行使法。在檢驗特勤人員以電檢門查驗人民時，應遵守何種條件，始符合 條文規範之意旨？本文透過對具體個案判決結果，分析於檢查點設置電檢門查 驗之適法性，手持金屬探測器之探測與設置電檢門查驗之比例原則，人民拒絕 查驗之異議程序，並進一步探究特勤條例未來修法之方向，另在不修法之現行 架構下，應如何解釋適用法律，始能達成兼顧元首維安與人權保障之雙重目的。

ㄌThe work of Special Service refers to the act of maintaining individual safety of important figures, such as the President or the Vice-President, etc. The main objective of such work is taking measures to eliminate threats and interferences that could jeopardize personal safety of the subject under the protection of Special Service. Nevertheless, the rights and interests of the public should still be taken into consideration while performing the work of Special Service. The Article 12 of Secret Service Act is the legal basis for inspecting the public. Per the Article 12. In additional to being subject to area of security maintenance, the work of Special Service shall apply the principle of proportionality and the Police Power Exercise Act, mutatis mutandis. Particularly, what conditions should be met when agents of Special Service inspect the public with archway metal detectors? This paper analyzes this topic by review cases of judgment and examine it from the following three perspectives: (1)the legality of establishing metal detection door at checkpoints；(2)the principle of proportionality in terms of the differences between using archway metal detector and handheld metal detectors；(3)the objection procedures for the public when they refuse to walk through the archway metal detector. Furthermore, this paper also explores the direction of the future revision of Secret Service Act, as well as the applicable interpretation of the current version of law. This paper argues that maintaining President’s Personal Safety without damaging human rights is achievable.