文章詳目資料

教育心理學報 ScopusTSSCI

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 巔峰型教師的樣貌:圓滿幸福、知覺工作壓力、靈性幸福感及心理健康之關係
卷期 50:1
並列篇名 What does the flourishing teacher look like? The Relationships between Flourishing, Perceived Work Stress, Spiritual Well-being and Mental Health
作者 余民寧陳柏霖陳玉樺
頁次 001-030
關鍵字 主觀幸福感知覺工作壓力圓滿幸福巔峰型教師靈性幸福 感Perceived work stressFlourishingSpiritual well-beingSubjective well-beingThe flourishing teachersTSSCIScopus
出刊日期 201809
DOI 10.6251/BEP.201809_50(1).0001

中文摘要

傳統上,健康的概念被視為不僅是沒有心理疾病,而且必須是同時擁有心理健康的一種完整狀 態。教師心理健康狀態,長期以來備受各界所熱衷探討的關鍵議題。本研究旨在了解巔峰型教師 的樣貌,探究圓滿幸福、知覺工作壓力、靈性幸福感及心理健康之關係。本研究為橫斷性研究, 採用問卷調查法,隨機抽樣兩批全國中小學教師,共獲得2,400 名有效樣本進行調查。問卷內容 包括主觀幸福感短版量表、圓滿幸福量表、靈性幸福感量表、臺灣憂鬱情緒量表。採用獨立樣本 t 檢定、驗證性因素分析、結構方程式模型等分析。研究發現:(1)大多數教師的心理疾病程度 偏低,但仍有9.8%的中小學教師群,係屬於幽谷型的心理健康狀態類型;(2)「掙扎型」,共1 人(0.1%)、「徬徨型」,共5 人(0.2%)、「混亂型」,共54 人(2.3%)、「奮戰型」,共50 人(2.1%)、 「大眾型」,共240 人(10%)、「愁善型」,共316 人(13.2%)、「顛峰型」,共520 人(21.7%)、 「滿足型」,共978 人(40.8%)、「幽谷型」,共236 人(9.8%)。(3)巔峰型教師比起幽谷型教師 具有較佳的靈性幸福感、圓滿幸福、知覺較低的工作壓力負荷;(4)巔峰型教師的靈性幸福感在 圓滿幸福與憂鬱間扮演調節的角色;(5)巔峰型教師的主觀幸福感在知覺工作壓力與憂鬱間扮演 中介的角色。整體而言,巔峰型教師比其他類型教師,具有較好的心理健康狀態與特質。最後依 據本研究的發現,提出未來研究的具體方向與相關限制。

英文摘要

Traditionally, the concept of health was viewed as not sick or no-illness and the mental health was conceptualized as absence of mental illness. The main purpose of this study was to explore teachers' mental health. The purpose of this current study is to explore the teachers with the type of flourishing mental health. The relationships between flourishing, perceived work stress, spiritual well-being and mental health. This is a cross-sectional study, used the data randomly sampled from the elementary to senior-high-school teachers of whole Taiwan. A total random sample of 2,400 teachers were collected and analyzed. They were asked to fill up four scales anonymously: Subjective Well-Being-short form (SWB-SF), Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SPIRTWBS), Flourishing Scale (FS), and Taiwan Depression Scale (TDS). Data analysis included the t-test, CFA, and SEM. Results show that 1) Most teachers did not exhibit mental illness symptoms, however, 9.8% of the teachers were classified into the languishing mental health status; 2) There was 2.3% of teachers’ (54) in a floundering state, 0.2% of teachers’ (5) in a hovering state, 0.1% of teachers’ (1) in a struggling state, 13.2% of teachers’ (316) in sentimental state, 10% of teachers’ (240) in popular state, 2.1% of teachers’ (50) in a striving state, 9.8% of teachers’ (236) in languishing state, 40.8% of teachers’ (978) in a contented state, 21.7% of teachers’ (520) in flourishing state; 3) The flourishing teachers have significantly higher scores on the whole spiritual well-being, flourishing, lower work stress than those of the languishing teachers; 4) “Spiritual well-being” play moderating effect for “flourishing “to “depression”. 5) “Subjective well-being” play mediation role for “perceived work stress “to “depression”. On the whole, the flourishing teachers have better mental health status and traits than other types of teachers. Finally, according to findings of this research, the researcher proposed the specific directions for future researches and restrictions.

相關文獻