篇名 | 當代民主、道德與教育:Hans-Jochen Gamm教育倫理學之探究 |
---|---|
卷期 | 46:4=539 |
並列篇名 | Contemporary Democracy, Moral and Education: Inquiry into Hans-Jochen Gamm’s Educational Ethics |
作者 | 梁福鎮 |
頁次 | 023-044 |
關鍵字 | Gamm 、 唯物主義 、 教育倫理學 、 Materialism 、 Educational Ethics 、 A&HCI |
出刊日期 | 201904 |
本文採用教育詮釋學方法,進行Gamm教育倫理學之探究,以闡述其對民主、道德與教育的看法。Gamm提出唯物主義取向的教育倫理學。其思想淵源來自Comenius的教育理論、Immannuel Kant的教育理論、Karl Marx的歷史唯物主義、Theodor W. Adorno的批判理論和Heinz-Joachim Heydorn的教育理論。Gamm教育倫理學的主要內涵包括教育倫理學的問題與取向,教育倫理學的人員與機構,教育行動的價值與規範,教育倫理的認識與行動和教育倫理學未來的課題。Gamm的教育倫理學具有指出教育倫理學的問題與取向、闡明教育倫理學的人員與機構、提出教育行動的價值與規範、聯結教育倫理的理論與實踐和指出教育倫理學未來的課題等優點,當然也存在著教育倫理學問題的對策不夠具體、教育行動的價值與規範缺乏共識和誤解資本主義是文盲問題的原因等問題。儘管如此,Gamm的教育倫理學仍然非常重要,可以提供我國作為建立教育倫理學的參考,幫助我們瞭解人員與機構的實際狀況,提供教育行動的價值與規範給教育人員,聯結教育倫理的理論與實踐和指引我國教育倫理學未來的發展方向,相當值得我們加以重視。
This article used method of educational hermeneutics to investigate Gamm’s educational ethics, in order to explain Gamm’s opinions about democracy, moral and education. Gamm is an important scholar in field of educational ethics. He brought up a materialistic approach of educational ethics. Gamm’s educational ethics affected by Comenius’s educational theory, Kant’s educational theory, Marx’s historical materialism, Adorno’s critical theory and Heydorn’s educational theory. The contents of his educational ethics include the problems and approach of educational ethic, the personnel and institutions of educational ethics, the values and norms of educational action, the knowing and action of educational ethics and the future missions of educational ethics. There are some advantages regarding Gamm’s educational ethics: First to point out the problems and approach of educational ethics, second to explain the personnel and institutions of educational ethics, third to bring up the values and norms of educational action, fourth to associate theory and practice of educational ethics, fifth to address the future missions of educational ethics. Certainly, Gamm’s educational ethics has some problems. For example, the counter measures of problems of educational ethics are not concrete, there is no consensus about values and norms of educational ethics and he misunderstands capitalism as the reason of illiteracy problem. Even though, Gamm’s educational ethics is still very important. It could be a reference for us to establish educational ethics, to understand real situation of personnel and institutions, to associate theory and practice of educational ethics, to offer the values and norms of educational action for educators and to solve problems of educational ethics. Therefore, it deserves us to pay attention to Gamm’s educational ethics.