受到巴特的影響，漢語神學界對施賴爾馬赫神學提出了兩個批評：其一，施賴爾馬赫神學的根基是人類學；其二，施賴爾馬赫神學缺乏對教會的關注。本文對這兩點批評提出質疑。本文認為施賴爾馬赫教義學的根基不是一般性的人類學，而是歷史的拿撒勒的耶穌帶來的救贖，並認為施賴爾馬赫教義學與歷史的教會之間具有密切的關聯，它既源於教會，又是教會的蘇格拉底式的對話夥伴。

In the influence of Karl Barth, Sino-Christian theology has put forward two kinds of criticism on Schleiermacher: firstly, Schleiermacher rooted his theology on anthropology; secondly, Schleiermacher’s theology paid little attention to church. This paper challenges the above criticism. As the paper demonstrates, on the one hand, the root of Schleiermacher’s theology is not a kind of general anthropology, but the redemption accomplished by Jesus of Nazareth, on the other hand, Schleiermacher’s dogmatics is closely related to the historical church which is both the source of his dogmatics, and its Socratic partner.