本文主要採用文獻分析法，彙整與學校學生家長會有關的中央法令及地方政府相關法規範，併從行政法學的觀點，探討「學生家長出席學生家長會」與「繳納家長會費」強制規定的適法性。《家庭教育法》第12條第1項、《國民教育法》第20條之2第2項，以及〈國民教育階段家長參與學校教育事務辦法〉第4條第2款、第6款與第7款等諸規定，實無法推導出強制參加家長會與繳納家長會費等兩義務。責任與義務，意涵自是不同，不可混淆。強制入會規定不僅無法確保任何單一或全體的兒童最佳利益之實現，且有侵害當事人結社自由權的疑慮。繳納會費一義務，恐有違背法律保留原則一嫌疑。最後，根據研究結果，提出本文關於中、小學學生家長會運作之若干建議。

This study tried to use “Document Analysis” and aggregate the regulations of both central and local government about parents’ association, discussed the legality of imperative provisions about “attending parent association meetings” & “paying the membership fee of parents’ association” from the viewpoint of administrative law. Article 12, Item 1 of the Family Education Act, Article 20-2, Item 2 of the Primary and Junior High School Act and Article 4, paragraph 2, paragraph 6, and paragraph 7 of the Measures for Parents to Participate in School Education in the Stage of Primary and Junior High School cannot derive two obligations to force the participation in parents’ association and paying the membership fee of parents’ association. Responsibility and obligation are different and cannot be confused. The imperative provision about participating in parents’ association not only fails to ensure the realization of the best interests of any single or all child, but also has the doubt about an invasion of the party’s right to freedom of association. The obligation to pay the membership fee of parents’ association may violate the principle of legal reservation. Lastly, according to the research results, this study suggested to the operation of parents’ association at High Schools and Elementary Schools.