今日所見明代周弘祖《古今書刻》，為清末版刻家葉德輝依據日人島田翰所藏明刊本影刻而成，百餘年來，已成為學界通行研究之本。由於周氏記載內容相對簡略，其中不乏舛誤之處，在無他本可資校對情況下，導致其書在學術應用上頗受侷限。典藏中央研究院傅斯年圖書館之黃嘉善刻本《古今書刻》，乃是一部稀見版本，也是目前所知的海內外孤本，自民國17 年（1928）首度著錄至今，學界對其書所知甚少。黃嘉善本刊刻於明代晚期，根據周弘祖《古今書刻》進行增補校正，也是相對完善的版本。將此本與葉德輝刻本相互參照，除了著錄書籍數量之差異，也因二個版本之時間差異，意外提供部分研究議題之論辯證據，進而提升該書在文獻目錄學上的應用價值。本文透過相關文獻全面檢視，針對黃嘉善本版式樣貌與藍印本特性進行概說，並大略勾勒其書流傳至傅斯年圖書館之輾轉歷程。再者，藉由辯證考誤，將有助釐清其版本系統及所錄諸書之來源。最後，結合其他史料綜合考察，開拓《古今書刻》嶄新研究面向，以充分發揮其書在版本目錄學上之應有功能。

An Index of Ancient and Contemporary Books and Stone Tablets (Gu Jin Shu Ke, also named Book Inscribed) was designed by Zhou Heung-Zu in Ming Dynasty and became the popular version. Ye De-Hui obtained this book from Japan in late Qing Dynasty and soon after reprinted this book that was based upon its original format. Because this version was still simple and had some error, so it brought some limition in academic applications. In addition to Ye De-Hui version, another rare edition inscribed by Huang Jia-Shan (Huang version for short) kept at Fu Ssu-Nien Library. Academic circles did’t reconnized this version not yet from 1928. Huang version was engraved in late Ming Dyansty. The version supplemented and regulated according to Zhou Heung-Zu’ version. This essay will collate and compare these two versions. At the same time, this essay will study the difference which the amount and history between these two versions. Furthermore, this essay will examine related documents comprehensively and outline the the propagation of Huang Jia-Sha’s version. On the basis of study, we can clarify the source of these differect version systems. At last, this essay will combined with other historical materials to expand research value of An Index of Ancient and Contemporary Books and Stone Tablets.