解嚴後，學術市場出現很多研究金門戰役史蹟的著作。隨著檔案的開放、解密，以及政治氛圍的改變，史觀也不再定於一尊。這些作品不但改變了我們對戰爭的傳統看法，也激勵我們重新思考戰爭的意義與價值。本文試著從學術發展史的脈絡，分析這些作品的內容與特色，各領域的研究狀況，進而思考未來的研究方向。金門的戰役史蹟研究已遇到瓶頸，不管是政府或個人，都要改變心態，設法突破研究方法，引進不同學門的理論。同時，史觀也要與時俱進，不再拘泥於地域主義。發生在金門的這幾場戰役，以及之後的軍事治理，影響了上一代與這一代的金門人，是金門人揮之不去的傷痛。但是，有關金門戰役史蹟的研究，不能只為金門，應該提供一些經驗法則，作為全世界人類追求和平的借鏡。

After the end of martial law, there were many books on the history of battles in 1950s’ Quemoy. With the opening and decryption of archives and the change of political atmosphere, historical views are no longer set at one. These works not only change our traditional view of war, but also motivate us to rethink the meaning and value of war. This paper tries to analyze the content and characteristics of these works and the research status of each field, from the context of academic development history, and then think about the future research direction. The research on Quemoy’s campaign history has encountered bottlenecks. Whether it is the duty of government, we must change our mindset and try to break through the research methods and introduce different theories. At the same time, Historical view should also keep pace with the times and not be constrained by regionalism. The battles that took place in Quemoy and the subsequent military governance affected the two generations. It was the lingering pain of the people. However, the study on the historical site of the Battle of Quemoy cannot be only for the natives. It should provide some rules of thumb as a mirror for the pursuit of peace in the world.