首屆高級中等以下學校課程審議會（簡稱課審會）學生代表遴選會議（簡稱遴選會），女性學生代表候選人因「性別比例原則」而全數當選課審會學生代表，是否隱含制度設計的問題？本文探討遴選會中不同性別的參與程度差別、學生對性別比例原則的詮釋及性別比例原則是否影響其參選和投票意向，本文採質性方法為研究取徑，資料蒐集的來源分別為直播紀錄影片、會議文件、訪談法三種。本文指出女性不論是參與人數、發言總次數、發言人數皆遠低於男性，而從訪談中也發現雖然女性被保障了，但卻是「贏了面子、輸了裡子」。女性雖因保障而獲得參與的機會，但這樣的保障僅能作為最低限度且暫時的一種機制，因此本文建議教育部應採取更積極的行動，以培力學生，並改善參與者的不平等位置。此外，也應將性別參與的比例作為指標，以確保不同性別的意見得以展現。

This article analyzed gender quota in the student representatives selection meeting of elementary and secondary schools curriculum review committee, and investigated whether all female candidates elected as student representatives due to gender quota, implying a system design issue. The study explored whether the differences in the participation level of different genders, students’ opinions on the gender quota, and the gender quota will affect their candidacy and voting intentions. The study adopted the qualitative approach, and the data sources are from recorded live videos, meeting documents, and interviews. The study showed that the female candidates were less involved in the selection meeting than their male counterparts, regardless of the number of candidates, the frequency of expressing opinions, and the number of people speaking in the meeting. However, the interviews also discovered that female candidates who passed the qualification for student representatives won the war but actually lost the battle. Although women are given the opportunity to participate in because of gender quota, such guaranteed quota can only serve as a minimum and temporary mechanism. Therefore, the study suggested the Ministry of Education empower students and improve participation inequality by taking active actions. In addition, the study recommended considering the ratio of gender participation as a guideline to ensure the opinions of different genders are heard.