新型冠狀病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情造成全球災難性的影響與衝擊，進而促使世界各地的企業、學研機構、政府機關積極投入疫情對策研發，在研發過程中藉由共享智慧財產權與相關研究資源的開放式創新模式，成為各國與疫情拉扯，爭取對策研發時間的最佳途徑。本文由開放式創新理論探討疫情期間世界各國的研發協作案例，驗證開放式創新「開放取向」與「商業收益」取向兩種模式的差異，進而指出疫情期間的協作案例多採附條件或期限的「開放取向」，而在疫情過後仍回歸「商業收益」取向。因此認為後疫情時代的數位轉型，屬於「商業收益」取向之開放式創新，而必須藉由納入開放授權思維的創新智財策略，來確保開放式創新的成果得以轉化為商業收益。

During the pandemic of COVID-19, the open innovation theory becomes the most effective model for finding out the crisis resolution. This article studies the collaborative cases of countries around the world to fight the epidemic, and discovers the differences from "Open Access Innovation" (OAI model) to "Open Business Innovation" (OBI model). Cases of collaboration during pandemic are almost OAI model with license period or conditions change to OBI model. And the post-COVID-19 innovative model should be OBI model which highly depends on IP strategy to segment open IP license part with business part.