本文藉由當代新儒家們對「陸九淵」學說的研究分析，展示徐復觀、唐君毅，牟宗三這三位代表人物不同的研究方法與儒學觀點。徐先生著重將研究對象回歸歷史情境進行考察，試圖掘發其思想的邏輯結構，呈現由義利之辨的思想闡析落實至客觀面的政治思想之研究。唐先生以哲學發展史的脈絡探討象山的學說，並結合個人生命體驗的觀點，認為發明本心當包含自信本心與剝落障蔽之正、反兩面的整體性工夫。牟先生則著眼於象山「非分解」的言說特點，更採取比較哲學的研析觀點，指出其學說不僅是道德的自律型態，又具有超越的無限心之義涵。綜上所述，得具體地看到徐、唐、牟三人雖同以陸王心學為依歸，但他們的研究方法有別，對儒學的根源性理解殊異，是以對象山的研究呈現豐富的多樣面貌。掌握這些觀點與方法，當可作為傳統儒學之當代新詮的重要借鏡。

This essay discusses Lu Xiang-shan’s doctrines researched by 3 representatives of contemporary Neo-Confucianism, Hsu Fu-kuan, Tang Chun-I and Mo Tsung-san. Although the 3 research are all based on Lu-Wang’s theory of mind, they understand Lu Xiang-shan’ s thinking in different ways. The main reason is that their methods and angles are different, which are history of thought, history of philosophy and comparative philosophy. In addition, their interpretations of Confucianism are also different. Once we understand this, we can study this issue further.