《四庫》與《總目》的提要評介，歷來學者考校辨證，大抵以卷帙、版本或辨偽之學，作為關注之重點，較少能夠從有關《易》著本身實質內容的面向上著手，作更具體周延而準確的釐清，瞭解有關之提要評介，可能存在的諸多重大缺失或問題，進行更為客觀合理的補正。學者研究收錄的相關《易》著之思想，可能以已經存在舛誤的提要評介，作為論述與認識之基點，進行初步的、直接而理所當然的理解；館臣既有的錯誤，直接影響學者對典籍的認識與判斷，若不作詳察，恐致誤導，將錯就錯。本文特別選擇注意到之幾部具爭議之典籍，包括應為南宋時期且作者不明的《大易象數鈎深圖》、明代章潢《周易象義》，以及明代錢一本《象抄》等三部《易》著，把握從內容的本身進行關注與耙梳，並對比具體相關之《易》著，針對《四庫》館臣有關的評介，提出商榷與補正。

When it comes to the research on the annotations of Siku Quanshu and Siku Quanshu Zongmu Tiyao (the annotated catalog), most scholars have focused on the verification of volumes, versions, and the authenticity of the books in question. They rarely, if ever, approached them in terms of the real contents of Yi to make a thorough and precise evaluation, or examine related annotated bibliographies; nor did they probe into existing mistakes or potential problems, or offer objective and sensible supplements or corrections. When conducting their research, many researchers started, unfortunately, on the premise that accuracy was ensured and thus did preliminary studies and made analyses on the basis of these existing false annotations. The mistakes made by Siku editors directly undermined these researchers’ understanding and evaluation of the original works. Without closer inspection, the research findings could be misleading, which might lead to more mistakes as a result. Therefore, the study, focusing on three books: the anonymous Dayi Xiangshu Goushentu in Southern Song, Zhouyi Xiangyi by Zhang Huang in Ming Dynasty, and Xiang Chao by Qian Yiben in Ming Dynasty, will also examine and comb through their contents, compare and contrast related Yi works, and propose assessments, supplements and corrections to related annotations made by Siku editors.