清末學者汪鎣著有《爾雅正名》，全書凡十九卷690條，主要就字形論文字之正譌。黃侃曾手批其書300餘條，改從音義關係去探討本字、本義及語源，可以正汪書之失，並補其不足。章太炎親為之序。武漢大學出版社即據以出版《黃侃手批爾雅正名》一書，為考證《爾雅》文字正變之專著，與嚴元照《爾雅匡名》可以前後輝映。此書鮮為學界所注意，故本文對汪鎣《爾雅正名》及黃侃評點進行初步探索。首先，《爾雅正名》內容體例包括校異文、訂譌誤、求本字、知正變、考通用、注音切、言互見、引書證。其次，黃侃《爾雅正名評》評點要項：正其訛誤、刪其條文、質其疑義、補其不足、慎於取捨。最後，對《爾雅正名》之特色，如考求正變、崇尚漢學、重視《說文》等，及缺點，如過分精簡、體例不純、忽略音訓等作一評價。庶幾對汪鎣、黃侃及近代的《爾雅》學有進一步的闡述。

Scholars in the late Qing Dynasty wāngyīng authored by” ěryǎzhèngmíng”. The book has 19 volumes and 690 articles, mainly focusing on the correctness and wrongness of characters. Huang Kan once personally criticized more than 300 articles of his book, and changed to discuss the orthograph, original meaning and etymology from the relationship between sound and meaning, which can correct the deficiencies of Wang Shu and make up for its deficiencies. Preface by Zhang Tai-yan. Wuhan University press published the book “Huang Kan’s Hand Criticism of ěryǎzhèngmíng”, which is a monograph to verify the textual change of “Erya”, which can be reflected back and forth with Yan Yuan-zhao’s “Erya Kuangming”. The academic circles did not pay attention to this book, so this paper makes a preliminary exploration of Wāng-yīng and his “ěryǎzhèngmíng”. First, the content style of “ěryǎzhèngmíng” includes proofreading different texts, correcting mistakes, seeking its orthograph, knowing and clerical change, examine the use of circulation, phonetic notation, explain each other and citation. Secondly, Huang Kan”ěryǎzhèngmíngpíng” important items marked by criticism include：correct its errors, delete its improprieties, challenge its doubts, make up for its deficiencies, and be cautious of its choices. Finally, I will comment on the characteristics of “ěryǎzhèngmíng”, such as pursue orthography and change shape, advocating sinology, and emphasizing “Shuawen”, and shortcomings, such as oversimplification, impure style, and neglect of sound training. I hope to elaborate further on Wang Ying, Huang Kan and modern “Er Ya” studies.