本文选择从法律经济学的理念出发，突出效益观下的商事纠纷化解，把商事纠纷优先回归商业问题，加以“微型审理”程序引导，或可提高效率，促进多方利益最大化。再则，鉴于中国商事仲裁广阔的发展空间及与“微型审理”的部分共通性，有别于协商与调解的正式高效的程序下进行，亦是实现传统ADR与混合型ADR相互补正，促使纯民间ADR与准司法ADR相互协调的非诉纠纷解决机制创新的契机。因此，我们结合中国现有多元纠纷解决模式，建议采取商事仲裁机构为依托的“微型审理＋商事仲裁”的外化复合程序，从而提供一种具有中国发展特色的商事纠纷解决新思路。

This article chooses to proceed from the concept of law and economics, highlighting the resolution of commercial disputes under the view of benefit, giving priority to returning commercial disputes to commercial issues, and guiding them with “mini-trial” procedures, which may improve efficiency and maximize the benefits of multiple parties. Furthermore, in view of the broad development space of commercial arbitration in China and some commonalities with “mini-trial”, it is different from the formal and efficient procedures of negotiation and mediation. Opportunity for the innovation of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism in which private ADR and quasi-judicial ADR coordinate with each other. Therefore, based on the existing multiple dispute resolution models in China, we propose to adopt the externalized composite procedure of “mini-trial + commercial arbitration” based on commercial arbitration institutions, so as to provide a new idea of commercial dispute resolution with Chinese development characteristics.