近年來，隨著智慧型手機普及與行車紀錄器等科技產品的發展，民眾舉發交通違規的數量不斷增加，對於警察勤務執行產生一定的影響。因此，立法院交通委員會修正了道路交通管理處罰條例，限制了檢舉範圍，以緩解警方負擔。然而，限縮檢舉項目是否能有效改善交通秩序及提升交通安全仍需討論。在立法過程中，修法意旨主要是為了限制惡意與連續檢舉行為，以及減緩因民眾檢舉案件量太過龐大而影響警察勤務執行。然而，限制檢舉項目並不能解決問題的根本，因為重點在於如何避免濫用檢舉制度。建立檢舉制度的初衷是為了保障公共利益，而非讓人民作為檢舉的工具。因此，應該從制度本身著手，加強檢舉的管控，避免濫用情況發生。對於交通執法機關而言，處理大量交通違規舉發案件的負擔相當沉重。限制檢舉項目可以緩解其工作量，但同時也可能限制了檢舉制度的作用。因此，更重要的是建立一套有效的案件處理機制，以提升處理效率，減輕警方的負擔。限縮檢舉項目可暫時緩解警方的工作負擔，但不能解決問題的根本。對於檢舉制度的改善，應該針對其管控與處理機制進行改善，才能真正達到促進交通秩序與提升交通安全的目的。本文就交通違規舉發之人民檢舉發及執法機關受理人民檢舉交通違規案件之舉發為研究範圍，擬從交通管理法規範之立法過程、修法意旨、交通違規舉發制度與現有交通執法機關之影響，探討限縮人民舉發交通違規項目是否有實益?如何降低警察機關行政工作負擔，改善交通秩序及提升交通安全，最後提出結論與建議。

In recent years, with the popularization of smart phones and the development of technological products such as driving recorders, the number of people reporting traffic violations has continued to increase, which has had a certain impact on the execution of police duties. Therefore, the Traffic Committee of the Legislative Yuan amended the Regulations on Road Traffic Management Penalties to limit the scope of reports to ease the burden on the police. However, whether the reduction of reporting items can effectively improve traffic order and enhance traffic safety still needs to be discussed. During the legislative process, the purpose of amending the law is mainly to limit malicious and continuous prosecutions, and to slow down the impact on police performance due to the large number of cases reported by the public. However, restricting whistleblowing items does not solve the root of the problem, because the focus is on how to avoid abuse of the whistleblowing system. The original intention of establishing the reporting system is to protect the public interest, not to use the people as a tool for reporting. Therefore, we should start from the system itself, strengthen the control of reporting, and avoid abuse. For traffic law enforcement agencies, the burden of dealing with a large number of traffic violation reporting cases is quite heavy. Restricting whistle-blowing items can ease their workload, but at the same time it may also limit the role of the whistle-blowing system. Therefore, it is more important to establish an effective case handling mechanism to improve handling efficiency and reduce the burden on the police. Restricting reporting items can temporarily ease the workload of the police, but it cannot solve the root of the problem. For the improvement of the reporting system, it should be aimed at improving its control and processing mechanism, so as to truly achieve the purpose of promoting traffic order and improving traffic safety. This article focuses on the people’s reporting of traffic violations and the law enforcement agency’s acceptance of people’s reporting of traffic violations as the research scope. It intends to discuss the impact of the traffic management law on the legislative process, the intent of the amendment, the traffic violation reporting system and the existing traffic law enforcement agencies. Is it beneficial to limit people's reporting of traffic violations? How to reduce the administrative workload of police agencies, improve traffic order and enhance traffic safety, and finally put forward conclusions and suggestions.