《近思錄》的纂輯原先是做為理學啟蒙讀物，朱熹將之類比為「階梯」，帶有工具性質之義，其後經大量的傳刻、詮解與後續纂錄，造就了《近思錄》成為聖學全備的經典。本文考察《近思錄》後續著述中，纂輯朱熹著述情形：首先，有關纂朱的意圖，係彌補了《近思錄》中沒有朱熹著作的缺憾，進而有意以「纂朱」著作做為《近思錄》之「階梯」；而隨著選錄內容的不斷擴大，所勾勒出的朱學面貌亦由「階梯」的工具義走向全幅圖像。其次，說明各代依循《近思錄》原訂的綱目架構進行輯錄朱子文獻，考察輯錄的數量、擇取文獻內容的差異，藉由其中的「異端之學」為例，可見各本「纂朱」著述所擬構的「異端」範圍擴大與深化；對於「異端」範疇進行輔翼性質的補充，也隱含了「異端」意義的組重，「浙學」與「陸學」二者選錄的消長即是寫照。

The compilation of "Reflections on Things at Hand"(Jinsilu) was originally used as an enlightenment book of Neo-Confucianism, and Zhu Xi compared it to a "ladder", which had the meaning of instrumental nature. After a lot of transmission, interpretation and subsequent compilation, "Reflections on Things at Hand"(Jinsilu)" became a complete classic of holy learning. This paper examines the compilation of Zhu Xi's writings in the follow-up writings of "Reflections on Things at Hand"(Jinsilu)".First of all, the intention of compiling Zhu made up for the lack of Zhu Xi's works in the "Reflections on Things at Hand"(Jinsilu), and then deliberately used Zhu's works as the "ladder" of the "Reflections on Things at Hand"(Jinsilu). With the continuous expansion of the selected contents, the outline of Zhu Xue also changed from the instrumental meaning of "ladder" to the full image. Secondly, it shows that each generation compiles Zhu Xi's literature according to the original outline framework of "Reflections on Things at Hand"(Jinsilu), and examines the differences in the quantity of compilation and the content of the selected literature. Taking the "heresy" as an example, it can be seen that the scope of heresy constructed by various Zhu's compilation works has expanded and deepened. Supplementing the category of "heresy" with its auxiliary wing also implies the combination of the meaning of "heresy", which is illustrated by the growth and decline of the selections of "Zhexue" (浙學)and "Luxue"(陸學).