2022年2月俄烏戰爭爆發，臺灣對於這場戰爭的報導數量明顯高於其他戰爭，若追溯俄烏衝突，自2014年起的克里米亞公投，便被西方媒體視為俄羅斯吞併烏克蘭領土的關鍵指標，並連帶影響烏東地區紛紛而起的自決訴求，而2022年9月的北溪天然氣管爆炸案當下，則被美國及烏克蘭指認為俄羅斯所為，儘管俄羅斯官方及部分媒體有不同聲音，但仍不被西方主流媒體所採納。本研究以克里米亞公投及北溪天然氣管爆炸案此二事件為研究案例，透過不同媒體的論述報導，尤其關切臺灣的消息來源與訊息採納，發現無論是質報、電視新聞或是網路原生媒體，對於上述訊息的揭露幾乎無條件地採納英、美等主流媒體觀點，如遇不同觀點之報導則以選擇或迴避的方式來呈現。研究認為儘管在國際新聞流通的機制下，臺灣媒體無可避免地採用較容易取得的西方觀點，但亦透過報導分析發現，我們在有其他的訊息來源時仍傾向選擇英美等主流媒體，從2014年到2023年，我們在俄烏衝突時的重要事件更像是英美的仿聲鳥而非是新聞報導者，然若能從單一觀點的複製到多元角度的併現，或許仍有機會吟唱出不同曲調。

Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war, it has had a significant impact on global politics and the economy. Taiwan's coverage of this war has been noticeably higher compared to other conflicts. This research focuses on two case studies: the Crimea referendum and the Nord Stream explosion. These two events are regarded by the West as the beginning of Russia's annexation of Ukrainian territory and the profound impact on Europe's energy supply. However, the Russian official stance and certain media outlets hold different perspectives on these matters. By analyzing the discourse and reporting of various media outlets, with particular attention to Taiwan's news sources and information adoption, it was found that regardless of print media, television news, or digitally native news, the exposure of the aforementioned information almost unconditionally adopted the viewpoints of mainstream Western media. When faced with different perspectives in reporting, they tended to choose or avoid presenting them. The research suggests that from 2014 to 2023, our coverage of significant events in the Russia-Ukraine conflict appeared more like an echo chamber of British and American narratives rather than independent reporting from Taiwanese media.