本文旨在分析並比較荷蘭、英國與臺灣在面對氣候變遷挑戰下，空間計畫體制調適方面的政策、法規與制度。透過深入剖析這些國家的案例，本研究探討了在法令、制度與組織三大面向的特色與差異，並從中提出對臺灣在氣候變遷調適方面的改進建議。荷蘭和英國在氣候變遷調適的策略上展現了較高的整合性和靈活性。荷蘭通過國家氣候適應戰略(National Adaptation Strategy, NAS)和氣候法案(Climate Act)的實施，強化了法規與政策的一致性，並透過地方政府與中央政府之間的密切合作，提高了調適策略的實施效率。英國則透過2008年的氣候變遷法(Climate Change Act)及其後續政策，建立了一個跨部門合作的多層次治理結構，有效地推動了氣候變遷調適的策略。相比之下，臺灣在氣候變遷調適的整體政策協調與實施上面臨較大的挑戰。雖然臺灣早在2002年即提出「環境基本法」，並在2015年推出「溫室氣體減量及管理法」，但在跨部門合作與資源整合方面仍存有不足。臺灣在氣候變遷調適的政策制定與實施上缺乏一個清晰且統一的上位指導和協調機制，導致政策推動上的分散與效率不足。綜合比較分析顯示，荷蘭與英國在氣候變遷調適策略上的成功，關鍵在於其高度整合的法令體系、跨部門合作的制度設計以及有效的組織執行力。反觀臺灣，則需強化法令的指導性、提升跨部門合作的效率，並建立更加統一且有力的調適領導與協調機構。針對後續研究，建議可進一步探討地方政府在氣候變遷空間計畫中的角色和貢獻，特別是在政策制定和實施階段的參與程度，以及如何增強地方政府的能力和資源。此外，未來研究也應聚焦於如何在臺灣建立一個更具調適性的上位治理架構，以應對氣候變遷所帶來的不確定性和複雜性，從而提高整體的氣候變遷調適能力。

This scholarly inquiry juxtaposes spatial planning frameworks for climate change adaptation in the Netherlands, the UK, and Taiwan. It underscores the Netherlands' and the UK's cohesive strategies, highlighted by legislative alignment and intergovernmental synergy, exemplified by the Netherlands' NAS and Climate Act and the UK's Climate Change Act of 2008. These nations exemplify effective adaptation through robust legislative, institutional, and organizational mechanisms. In contrast, Taiwan's climate change endeavors are hampered by fragmented interdepartmental collaboration and lack of a unified supervisory framework, despite the Environmental Basic Law and Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act. The analysis elucidates the essentiality of integrated legislation, collaborative institutional design, and effective execution for successful climate change adaptation, pinpointing these as areas needing significant enhancement in Taiwan. The study advocates for future research to focus on local governments' roles in climate change spatial planning, particularly their policy formulation and implementation involvement. It emphasizes the necessity of augmenting their capabilities and resources. Additionally, it recommends investigating adaptable supervisory governance frameworks for Taiwan to effectively navigate the complexities of climate change, thereby fortifying its resilience and adaptability. This scholarly work contributes to understanding the multifaceted nature of climate change adaptation strategies and the critical need for comprehensive, collaborative, and adaptive governance structures.