《四書大全》所引朱子後學說成為朝鮮朱子學吸收、轉化朱子思想的階梯，其中饒雙峰《論語》說注重經文的貫通比較，善於辨析朱注與程子說的異同，並就人性兩分、心氣關係、本末與理事、中和氣象等論題提出新解，引發了朝鮮學者的反復辨議，推進了朝鮮朱子學的發展。饒雙峰《論語》詮釋所體現的分析方法、創新觀點和批判精神對朝鮮朱子學產生了積極影響，表明加強朱子後學與朝鮮朱子學的比較研究，是未來東亞朱子學研究值得重視的方向。

The theory of Zhu Zi disciples cited in Si Shu Da Quan was a ladder and bridge for Korean Zhu Zi School to absorb and digest Zhu Zi’s thoughts. Rao Shuangfeng of Southern Song Dynasty was famous for his investigating principles exactly and his ideas often disagreed with those of Zhu Zi. By analyzing the differences between Zhu Zi’s notes and Cheng Zi’s theories cited in the Commentaries of the Four Books, he put forward new views to the dichotomy of human nature, the relationship between mind and Qi, fundamental—incidental and Principle—things, and Zhonghe Qixiang in the annotation of The Analects. Korean scholars have carried out in-depth analysis of the theory of Rao Shuangfeng and expressed their respective attitudes and opinions. The analytical methods, innovative views and critical attitudes which embodied in the Rao Shuangfeng’s interpretation of classics, have produced a positive impact on Korean Zhu Zi School and promoted the development of Korean Zhu Zi School. So, we should strengthen the comparative study on the interpretation of Confucian classics between Zhu Zi disciples and South Korean Zhu Zi School, in order to advance the research of Zhu Zi Studies in East Asia.