本研究旨在探討點線面構成的創意設計，透過相關文獻資料的收集與整理，做為研究的理論基礎，並以立意取樣的方式，選取建國科技大學商業設計系摘要96學年度入學之修學院校二專一年級三位非本科學生為研究對象，以質的方式，針對學生的學習過程進行觀察、訪談及記錄。接著，要求學生依個人在各個主題中所欲表現的設計概念，以口頭報告的方式進行發表，再根據授課教師所給予的意見加以修正最後，擬定創意設計之作品評分表，做為學生創作的評分基準，並請兩位設計之專業教師進行評分，再將三位
非本科學生之學習與訪談結果予以展示及說明。本研究根據研究結果提出以下幾點結
論，提供教師教學或未來非本科學生選讀設計相關科系參考。
1.不論資訊科技如何突飛猛進，手繪能力仍是學習設計的重要基礎，是無法完全被取代
2.創意設計的成果可以透過討論與口頭發表等方式，得以激發出更優異的表現。
3.習背景不足之處，並獲得師生們的肯定。在選讀設計相關科別時，勢必須花費更多的時間與精力，才能彌補過去學
4.非本科學生只要願意專心投入設計相關主題的創作與設計，並勇於參與討論與修正，其進步的程度是可觀的。

This research aimed at exploring originative design on the constitution of dot/line/dimension, dependence on collection and arrangement in the correlatively literature information was utilized as theoretical foundation in research, a mode of random sampling selected three freshmen at a two-year college who were admitted into Commercial Design Department of Chienkuo Technology University in 2006 academic year and didn’t specialize in delving into their recognized subject and being aimed at the students’ learning process to proceed observation, interview and record in the form of adopting qualitative research. Consequently, a student was asked to conduct announcement in the form of oral report according to individual who had desire to express his designing concept in each subject and amendment was made on the basis of opinion given by a teacher who taught lesson to a student. Eventually, drawn up was table of marks or points given by a teacher for work for originative design which was used as marking standard for a student’s creative work, entreating two teachers who specialized in design to proceed marking process and the result of learning and interview for the three students who didn’t specialize in delving into their selective subject was demonstrated and expounded. This research was based on researching result to submit the following conclusions, which will be referred to by both the teachers in teaching and the future’s students who didn’t specialize in delving into their recognized subject for how to choose the relative department accordingly.
1.No matter how information technology possessed rapid progress, drawing capability by hand was a tremendously imperative foundation, which absolutely completely failed to be substituted.
2.That the result of ingenious design was through discussion and oral announcement could arouse more superior performance.
3.To let it be known that the students who didn’t specialize in delving into their selective subject should spend more time and energy in studying to make up for background’s insufficiency in the past and acquire both a teacher and their students’ affirmation while they chose the correlative subject in design.
4.It was a very stupendous and observable progress that the students who didn’t specialize in delving into their recognized subject only wanted to focus on originality and design for the correlatively scheming subject and that they were brave enough to participate in the discussion and amendment.