本文基於文學史的「內在」詮釋期望，設想「清代臺灣賦」若大致受「某一文學標準規範和習例的系統所支配」，則當時可能的「賦學基準」為何？由於清代臺灣本地的「賦論」文獻極為有限，故本文透過自中國大陸流傳到臺灣的《少嵒賦草》，以「流傳意味接受」為前提，從書中找出「以庾信賦為正典」的一項「賦學基準」，繼而探尋清代臺灣賦中是否有相同的事實。研究結果發現：除了《瀛洲校士錄》有陳奎〈擬庾子山小圜賦〉一篇，洪繻多篇題目含「春」字的賦篇及〈小樓賦〉，亦為庾信〈春賦〉和〈小圜賦〉的投影。

These days Fu is taken notice gradually in research of Taiwanese classical literature. “Shao Yan Fu Cao” was a popular collected literary works in medium and later periods of Qing Dynasty at Taiwan. Yu Xin was a famous poet in Six Dynasties. “Shao Yan Fu Cao” and Taiwanese writer of Fu praised Yu Xin as literary canon. Some of Hong Xu’s Fu imitated “Small garden Fu” and “Spring Fu” written by Yu Xin.