雖然近年來國內外實證研究結果皆突顯出婚姻暴力與兒童虐待存在於同一家庭中的現象，但家暴防治與保護實務工作經常呈現各爲其主的不協調甚至於衝突的狀態，而無法將家中所有的受害成員整合於家暴服務的安全保護傘之下。因此，本研究旨在探索婚暴併兒虐服務整合的現況與挑戰，並探索服務整合的可能模式，以作爲服務輸送與國家政策制定之參考。本研究設計採量化與質化研究的整合模式，以全台各縣市的公私立家暴防治機構的資深實務工作者爲研究對象，收集相關資料。本研究首先以焦點團體方式收集質化資料，並依質化資料的分析結果設計成量化問卷，再寄送給全台各縣市家暴防治機構社工人員填寫以收集量化資料。本研究於台灣北、中、南三區共舉辦五場焦點團體，計有24位機構督導或主管出席；問卷的部份共有39位機構督導或主管填答，問卷回收率爲88.6%。研究結果顯示，台灣各縣市針對婚暴併兒虐案件的服務模式與分工制度有所不同，且缺乏一套標準化的工作流程。不論是依服務對象或是責任區域分工，都有其利弊得失。研究參與者認爲的理想整合模式應以家庭爲中心派案、有主貴社工、工作流程標準化、以及加強家暴加害人的處遇。在配套措施方面，則須舉辦定期訓練以提昇社工員之專業知能、發展婚暴併兒虐之篩選接案指標、合併案件由資深社工員處理、開發民間資源、以及將行政工作與直接服務分開。本研究最後建議完整的服務模式應該要包括受暴配偶、子女和相對人的個別服務以及整體的家庭處過，並建議相關主管單位儘速研擬婚暴併兒虐案件的處過原則或是標準化的工作流程、針對各個家暴防治網絡進行教育訓練、且積極爭取司法體系的合作以加強加害者的處遇計畫。

Both Western and domestic empirical studies provide overwhelming evidence that marital violence and child abuse often co-occur in the same families. Moreover, the experiences of dual-violence have negative and long-term impact on children. However, marital violence and child abuse were often intervened by separate systems and practitioners that might result in uncoordinated services, and therefore, was not able to protect all the victims of family violence. In order to prevent the fragment services, this study aims to examine the challenges and possible model of integrating marital violence and child abuse services. Examining the issue of integrated services can avoid the lack of coordination and conflict between the marital violence and child abuse service sectors, and help preventing family violence based on the consideration of enhancing the safety of all family members. This study used multiple data collection methods, including focus group and questionnaire. Five focus groups were held around the nation (including northern, central, and southern Taiwan) with the participation of 24 social work supervisors or directors. Quantitative data was collected from a sample of 39 social work practitioners in public or private agencies by using a questionnaire designed from the focus group qualitative data. The questionnaire completion rate is 88.6%. Research results show that there is no consistent model across the nation and there is a lack of standardized procedure for serving dual-violence families. Each model has its own advantages and disadvantages. Research participants suggest that the ideal integrated model should assign cases by families, rather than individuals. Moreover, it is better for the dual-violence family to have a case manager or social worker with authorized official power to be in charge of coordinating services. Developing a standardized operation process or handbook, and enhancing the batterer's treatment programs are also suggested. Finally, it is suggested that a complete service package should include not only individual services for the husband, the wife, and their children, but also treatment for the whole family as well. The service goal is to increase the safety and well-being of the whole family.