文章詳目資料

體育學報 TSSCI

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 雲林科技大學學生選修體育運動相關課程動機及滿意度之研究
卷期 24
並列篇名 AN STUDY OF SELECTED ON THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT CURRICULUM FOR STUDENTS OF THE NATIONAL YUNLIN UNIVER-SITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
作者 鍾志強
頁次 073-084
關鍵字 體育運動相關課程個體特性動機滿意度physicl education and sport curriculumSatisfactionMotivationpersonalcharacteristicsTSSCI
出刊日期 199712

中文摘要

本研究主要目的在探討個體特性與選修體育運動相關課程的動機及滿意度上的關係。受試樣本係以國立雲林科技大學264名為研究對象,並以選修體育運動相關課程問卷鳥工具,所得資料以因素分析、變異數分析及t考驗等方法進行資料分析。本研究結果發現:在動機上,取得「喜愛教學」、「自我喜好」及「充實生活」三個因素。在「喜愛教學」因素土,未參加運動代表隊學生較參加的學生動機強,工學院及管理學院學生較設計學院學生此項動機較強。在「自我喜好J及「充實生活」因素上,未參加運動代表隊學生較參加的學生動機強。在滿意度上,取得「教師」、「教務」兩個因素。在「教師」因素土,工學院學生較設計及管理學院學生感到滿意;三年級學生較二、四年級學生滿意。在「教務J因素上,未參加運動代表l擎的學生較為滿意,工學院及管理學院學生較設計學院學生感到滿意;三年級學生較四年級學生滿意。

英文摘要

Thepurpose of this research was to examine the relationships among personal characteristics of subjects on the select physicl physicl education and sport curriculum. 264 students enrolled in Yunlin University of Science and Technology have been chosen to participate in this study. All the research data is derived from the questionarire designed for the investigation of the select physicl education and sport curriculum. Factor analysis, t-test, ANOV A were employed to analyze the data. Theresult indicated are as follows: In Motivation ;Threefactors of motivation have been found. there were: Favorable Teaching 、PersenalInterest and Fulfill Life. Students of the engineering group and management group showed significantly higher mean scores on the Favorable Teaching than design group students. Themeans of non-collegite athletes on the Favorable Teaching were significantly higher than those of collegite athletes.Students of the non-collegite athletes showed significantly higher mean scores on the Persenal Interest and Fulfill Life were significantly higher than those of collegite athletes. In Satisfaction ;Two factors of Satisfaction have been found. there were: Teacher and Academic Teaching Program. Students of the engineering group showed significantly higher mean scores on the Teacher than design group and management group students. Students of the junior showed significantly higher mean scores on the Teacher than senior and sophomore students. Students of the engineering group and management group showed significantly higher mean scores on the Academic Teaching Program than design group students. Students of the junior showed significantly higher mean scores on the Academic Teaching Program than senior and sophomore students.

本卷期文章目次

相關文獻