文章詳目資料

體育學報 TSSCI

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 博奕理論在羽球比賽技術分析之應用--以Peter Gate為例
卷期 31、31
並列篇名 The Application of Game Theory on Technique Analysis of Badminton Competition: A Study of Peter Gade's Performance
作者 鄭元龍羅月英陳五洲
頁次 91-102
關鍵字 羽球策略博奕理論BadmintonTacticsGame theoryTSSCI
出刊日期 200109

中文摘要

     羽球是控制與反控制的運動項目,在賽前如能準確預測對手的長處,面對比賽時較能掌握戰術運用, 以己之長, 攻彼之短, 提高己方的勝率。 本研究使用由 Prentice-Hall(1994) 公司所研發的 AB:QM-- 博奕理論( Game Theory )套裝軟體運算分析得分得權與失分失權, 以丹麥羽球選手彼得蓋德在十四場國際比賽 16 種單打技術( 27項)對陣表為目標,藉以了解其技術優劣處,探討雙方對戰的情況。研究結果如下:一、彼得蓋德的總得分得權技術特長為:對角平高球( 40.6 %)、跳躍殺球( 16.4 %)、撲球( 14.1 %)、對角跳躍殺球( 9.4 %)、擋網前球( 8.6 %)等。二、彼得蓋德的總失分失權技術缺點為,對角低手挑長球( 37.6 %)、對角平高球技術(24.5 %)、髮夾式擊球( 23.6 %)、跳躍殺球( 10.1 %)等。三、彼得蓋德在勝場、負場的得分得權與總得分得權技術不同方面,依序有發抽球、髮夾式擊球、其他、對角擋網前球、對角抽球等。四、彼得蓋德在勝場、負場失分失權與總失分失權技術表現不同方面,依序有高長球、撲球、發短球、平高球等。

英文摘要

     Badminton is a sport of domination and counter-domination. The playerwho has the capability to anticipate an opponent's advantages before a match isthe one who can master tactics which will lead to a triumph. This analysis aimsto put to use the software of AB:QM? The Game Theory, developed by Prentice-Hallin 1994, as a set of operational analysis to evaluate the agining score/serviceand losing score/service of Denmark's badminton player peter Gate's fourteeninternational-level matches, using a matching chart to analyze the sixteen typesof single matches, using a matching chart to analyze the sixteen types of singlematching techniques (covering twenty-seven items), so as to see the advantagesand to probe into both sides of the matching condition. The results are asbelow:1. The technical strong points of Peter Gate's total gaining score/service are:cross flick clears (40.6%) jump-smashes (16.4%); net smash shots (14.1%); crossjump smashes (9.4%); net blockings (8.6%).2. The technical shortcomings of Peter Gate's total losing score/service are:cross underhand clears (37.6%); cross flick clears (24.5%); hairpin shots(23.6%); jump smashes (10.1%).3. The technical differences between the gaining score/service of thewinning/losing games and the total gaining score/service of Peter Gate'sperformance include: flick services; hairpin shot; and others; cross netblockings; cross drives.4. The technical differences between the losing score/service of thewinning/losing games and the total losing score/service of Peter Gate'sperformance include: high clear; net smash shots; low services; flick clears.

本卷期文章目次

相關文獻