文章詳目資料

體育學報 TSSCI

  • 加入收藏
  • 下載文章
篇名 登階測驗評估最大攝氧量的效度概化
卷期 20
並列篇名 The Validity Generalization of Step Test as a Measure of The Maximal Oxygen Intake
作者 王順正林正常
頁次 351-362
關鍵字 登階測驗最大攝氧量效度效度概化整合分析Step testMeta analysisValiditygeneralizationValidityMaximaloxygen intakeTSSCI
出刊日期 199512

中文摘要

本研究的目的,在利用效度概化的整合分析法,整合以往有關登階測驗評估最大攝氧量的效度研究,以暸解登階測驗評估最大攝氧量的效度是否達到概化。45個登階測驗評估最大攝氧量的效度研究結果(單一階段與多重階段的登階測驗效度資料各有31個與14個,受試者人數共有2177人次,其中男性受試者共1717人次、女性受試者共460人次),經過效度概化的計算處理之後發現,不管最大攝氧量是以腳踏車測功器、原地跑步機或其他方式測量,登階測驗評估最大攝氧量的技度皆未達到概化。女性為受試者的登階測驗效度優於男性,青少年烏受試者的單一階段登階湖驗效度優於青少年以土年齡者,3分 鐘運動時間的單一階段登階測驗技度優於5分鍾的運動時間。登階測驗評估最大攝氧量的方法較適合於青少年與女性,登階測驗的時間則以3分鍾的運動時間較烏有效。登階測驗評估最大攝氧量的真正技度則只在0.7左右。

英文摘要

The validity generalization model was utilized in this study to examine the generalizability of the validity of step test as a measure of the maximal oxygen intake. Forty five studies pertained to the validity of step test as a measure of the maximal oxygen intake had been reviewed, among which one-stage step test was utilized in 31 studies whereas multi-stage step test was utilized in the others. Amongthe 2177 participants reviewed, 1717 were males and 460 were females. Thefindings were indicated as follow: (1) the validity of step test as a measure of the maximal oxygen intake, that be measured on ergometer, tradmill or the others, was not found generalizable; (2)the validity of step test was more generalizable for women than for men; (3)the validity of one-stage step test was more generalizable for youth than other ages; and (4)the validity of one-stage step test was more generalizable for 3 min testing time frame than 5-min. In condusion, step test as a measure of the maximal oxygen intake is more appropriate for female and youth, further more, the 3 min testing time frame is more valid than the 5 min.

本卷期文章目次

相關文獻